Last week I celebrated two years since my PhD graduation. It’s hard to believe that after pre-K through doctorate, with only two short breaks (one year between college and masters, and six months between masters and PhD) in between, I am forever done with my formal education. In fact, it has now been over four years since my last PhD seminar. I thought about this fact recently as I assigned to my senior British Literature students a 4-7 page literary essay on either George MacDonald’s Phantastes or C. S. Lewis’ Chronicles of Narnia.
Up to that point in the semester I had assigned remarkably little homework all semester, but I still began to consider how easy it was for me, removed from being a student in the classroom for nearly four years, to fail to sympathize with my students. The longer I am removed from the classroom context as a student, the more danger I think there is that I will fail to have compassion on the students in their struggles, and the less I will remember how much work goes into such an assignment. It struck me that an important aspect of teaching is my ability to sympathize with my students’ weaknesses; indeed, one of my favorite promises in Scripture is that we have a Great High Priest who can sympathize with our weaknesses because he was tempted in every way as we are yet without sin (Heb 4:15).
I determined that in this case I would incarnate myself among the students and submit to my own assignment as a means of solidarity and perspective so that I might better sympathize with my students in this challenge. So I told them I would be writing the same paper that I had assigned them, that I would turn it in on time, and that any student who wanted to read and “grade” it was welcome to do so. What I learned through this experiment was remarkable. I found that the accountability of a deadline is a major motivating factor in productivity. I was reminded that talking about my ideas out loud with others and jotting down ideas on paper are immeasurably valuable tasks in the writing process. I reinforced the notion that the earlier I began thinking about a topic, the longer I had to stew on it in my mind, so that when it came time to write, my thoughts were already “marinated” and ready to be “cooked.” I learned that talking about other people’s papers, far from being a “waste of my time,” was one of the more valuable ways to keep my particular paper in proper perspective. And, by forcing myself to write the paper, I explored an aspect of MacDonald’s phenomenal work that I may otherwise have left unexplored.
Finally, I gained perspective regarding reasonable expectations. I have a PhD and have written probably 1000 pages of academic work. I have had a lot more experience than my 12th grade students. I had also read the novel one more time than each of the students. With all of these factors in place, I still found myself dissatisfied with my final product by the due date. I am not even convinced my paper will be the best. If despite all of my experience I found this assignment challenging, this process was certainly taxing on my students. I expect a lot from them, and they regularly deliver, but I am also keeping in mind as I grade them that an “A” paper may not need to be as “perfect” as I sometimes expect.
I certainly will not complete every assignment for every class that I assign, but putting myself in my students’ place and completing the assignment I asked them to complete was a valuable reminder and bore much good fruit. I will certainly do this again.
If you are interested, I have posted my Phantastes paper both in blog form and PDF on the website for your viewing. Please, no grades though.
Please add me to your email list.
LikeLike
Great article on never forgetting where we were. I think leadership definitely suffers when we no longer care to care about student needs by meeting them where they are.
LikeLiked by 1 person